Your Controls Block Known Attacks. What About the Behavior?

Your Controls Block Known Attacks. What About the Behavior?
The Blue Report 2026 from Picus Labs shows enterprise prevention recovered to 69%, but the gains hide serious weaknesses in behavioral defenses, especially once attackers are inside the network. Testing across Mimikatz and other post-compromise techniques shows that signature-based controls often miss quieter variants, with credential dumping and registry-based attacks slipping through far more easily than classic LSASS memory access. #PicusLabs #BlueReport2026 #Mimikatz #LSASS #ProcDump #comsvcsdll #SharpHound #T1003

Keypoints

  • Prevention effectiveness rose to 69%, but the overall average hides major gaps.
  • IOC-based testing measures known-bad detection, while TTP-based testing measures whether an action is stopped.
  • Malware download prevention fell to 50%, showing the edge is weakening.
  • Mimikatz was blocked 94% of the time in LSASS memory dumping, but only 17% for another memory path and 3% for registry-based LSA Secrets access.
  • Inside the environment, prevention dropped to 37%, and low-visibility actions like registry secrets extraction and SharpHound enumeration were barely stopped.

Read More: https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/your-controls-block-known-attacks-what-about-the-behavior/